
Theme Text– (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection (Revelation 20:5).
The Problem
1) What do the Scriptures say with regards to the upcoming thousand-year kingdom of Christ?
- The Bible forecasts that when Christ returns there will be a resurrection of all mankind from the dead by means of the ransom price Jesus paid for Adam on the cross (“Life for Life”) in order to redeem us all from death (Hosea 13:14, 1Timothy 2:6, 1Corinthians 15:21-22).
- The Bible also classifies the resurrection of mankind to be of two types:
- People of the First Resurrection – These are the followers of Christ who successfully prove their faith in him till death. They will rise to a special type of celestial resurrection where they shall rule with Christ over the rest of the resurrected mankind (i.e. the people of the second type of resurrection) for a thousand years (Revelation 20:6; 2:26-27; 5:10; 3:21, 2Timothy 2:12, 1Corinthians 15:40).
- People of the Second Resurrection – These are the rest of mankind who will rise to a terrestrial resurrection on Earth to learn righteousness under the thousand-year reign of Christ & his followers, and then be judged at the end of it (Acts 3:20-21, Isaiah 26:9, 1Corinthians 6:2).
- Thus, the thousand-year reign that shall commence after these two types of resurrection will have a specific purpose –
- Its goal would be the rehabilitation of the resurrected mankind under the reign of Christ and his victorious followers.
- Christ and his rulers will teach righteousness to the resurrected mankind.
- Even Satan shall be kept bound during these thousand years so that he does not interfere with the subjects of the Kingdom when they are being taught righteousness by their heavenly rulers (Revelation 20:1-2).
2) What is the problem posed by the text of Revelation 20:5?
The verse under question has two parts as below:
- 5.a – (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.)
- 5.b – This is the first resurrection.

The first part 5.a stands in contradiction with the rest of the Bible, especially with all the Scriptures we saw earlier that describe the purpose of the thousand-year kingdom to come.
- If the rest of mankind would not come to life and remained dead until the thousand-year rule ends, then that reign would have no purpose or cause.
- The People of the First Resurrection would be reigning over an empty planet as dummy rulers for no reason at all.
- There are some who try to claim that those rulers would just reign over the last human generation left alive on the planet at that given instant. But that theory bears neither scriptural testimony nor does it explain why only the last generation of humans deserves special treatment in learning righteousness under Christ & his followers, amidst special conditions of even Satan being bound – whereas all the earlier human generations had been left high and dry under Satan.
Thus, the verse Revelation 20:5a poses a significant problem to scriptural harmony – not only by contradicting with quite a lot of solid verses but also by essentially nullifying the all-important purpose of the Kingdom of Christ that is to come on the Earth.
As the Lord Jesus advised his followers, “Seek and ye shall find”, it’s indeed worthwhile to spend time seeking the written Scriptures for the truth. When we look at the context of Revelation 20:5 and search the manuscripts of the text of Revelation we find some interesting answers in this regard.
1. Context
The verses that provide the context surrounding Revelation 20:5 are as below.
Revelation 20:
- 4 – They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
- 5.a – (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.)
- 5.b – This is the first resurrection.
- 6 – Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection.
Thus, we see that verses 4-6 are in essence providing a coherent description of the first type of resurrection. Now let us focus on the 5.a part.
2. Manuscripts
Rev 20: 5.a – (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.)
When we search the earliest manuscripts, we arrive at below findings:
- The sentence 5.a is not found in the oldest and most reliable manuscripts, including the Sinaitic and Syriac.
- About 40% of the 200 available manuscripts of Revelation do not have 5.a.
- 50% of the earliest manuscripts from 4th-13th centuries do not have it.
- Going back further in time, the earliest manuscript available for Revelation is the Revelation commentary by Victorinus of Pettau (from 300 AD). And that commentary’s manuscripts do not have 5.a.
- Even in the manuscripts where 5.a is found, it is present in highly inconsistent forms
- In some scripts, it’s there only in the margins and not as part of the text
- Some have it starting with a ‘But’ whereas others prefix it with an ‘And’
- Some manuscripts that came much later have the ‘again’ whereas others do not
- The Anchor Bible describes the manuscripts’ evidence against 5.a.
Thus, when we verify the manuscripts, we find that this portion that says the rest of the dead did not rise to life until the end of the thousand years, was not really part of the original Bible. This would imply that someone inserted this part in later manuscripts with potentially ulterior motives.
3. The Insertion History
- As stated by several Scriptures, believers since the first century expected the resurrection of all mankind – i.e. “All the dead will rise!” – to happen when Christ returns to establish his Kingdom.
- When Emperor Constantine came to power, he declared Christianity as the official religion of his Empire and got the Christian Church merged with the Roman State.
- Gradually, in order to gain control over the masses, Rome started making claims that Christ’s thousand-year Kingdom/Empire had been established right then by the Roman Empire itself.

- But there was a problem with that claim. It faced a major glitch – If the Roman Empire was indeed Christ’s own kingdom, then why had the promised resurrection not happened then?
- The answer to that question was the primary motive for inserting 20:5a into the text. In order to prove that the Roman Empire was indeed Christ’s Empire, the resurrection of the masses had to be delayed further away past the times of the Empire’s projected thousand-year reign.
- So, potentially a scribe from the fourth or early-fifth century, under the influence of the Roman Empire, first added a comment in the margin, ‘The rest of the dead lived not until the thousand years were finished.’
- A later scribe moved it off the margins and into the text.
- It still didn’t gel with its context, so some scribes tried to prefix an ‘And’, while others put in a ‘But’.
- Scribes who came much later inserted an ‘again’ after the ‘lived not’.
- Thus 5.a is found in various inconsistent forms even in the manuscripts that have it.
Conclusion
D.D. Whedon writes in his ‘Commentary on the New Testament’ about Revelation 20:5a:
“There is a suspicious number of variations in copies containing the sentence. There are three variations in the Greek of the words but the rest; three variations of the word for lived; two for until… The sentence, like an interpolation, interrupts the current of the style. It breaks in between the next word, this, and the antecedent to which its affirmation refers. The sentence reads like an explanatory note by some copyist, which has been wrought into the text, and that in a very awkward position… no sound biblical scholar will now consider it worthy reliance…”
As a matter of fact, when we omit 5.a and read verses 4, 5.b and 6, we see a continuous flow of coherent narration, whereas 5.a stands out like a sore thumb, interrupting the narrative, forcing some Bible versions (eg. NIV) to even place it within parentheses. There is one plain reason for that. It was not there in the original. It was not part of the Bible. It was spuriously inserted by later scribes with malicious intent, ignoring the dire warnings about such actions by the book itself (Revelation 22:18), as Satan boldly tried to hijack Christ’s Empire for himself in the Roman Empire’s name.
According to the original Bible, Revelation 20:4-6 should read as below:
- 4 – They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
- 5.b – This is the first resurrection.
- 6 – Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection.
Yes, there are indeed two types of resurrections, but they are not set apart by thousand years. They are rather different in the sense that those of the first resurrection – the proven believers – get to sit on thrones with Christ and reign over those of the second resurrection – the rest of mankind – in order to teach them righteousness.
The thousand-year Kingdom of Christ will have a glorious purpose and that shall be the rehabilitation and restitution of the resurrected mankind under the heavenly rulership of Christ and his risen followers. Jesus himself labeled it as the “Renewal of All Things” (Matthew 19:28) and Peter deemed it as the “Times of Restitution of All Things” (Acts 3:21).
Amen, let us pray – “Thy kingdom come! Thy will be done on the Earth as it is in the Heavens!






"The People of the First Resurrection would be reigning over an empty planet as dummy rulers for no reason at all." Don't agree with this. Maybe you are correct that both resurrections occur at the beginning of the Millennium – it would make sense. However, if v.5 isn't a spurious addition, it wouldn't make an "empty planet" as Rev. 7:9-17 seems to describe a huge group (v.9) who survive the Great Tribulation (v.14) and have "washed their robes and made them white with the blood of the Lamb"(also v.14). This appears to be a large group of Tribulation survivors who converted during the Tribulation. It would make sense that they would be among those ruled during the Millennium so no "empty planet" to rule even if the second resurrection occurred at the end of the Millennium. Not saying I'm an expert at these things but that has been the way I would have solved the "empty planet" problem if the Second Resurrection was at the end of the Millennium.
Maybe you missed reading the next bullet point in the article that discusses your argument. Let me paste it here for your convenience:
There are some who try to claim that those rulers would just reign over the last human generation left alive on the planet at that given instant. But that theory bears neither scriptural testimony nor does it explain why only the last generation of humans deserves special treatment in learning righteousness under Christ & his followers, amidst special conditions of even Satan being bound – whereas all the earlier human generations had been left high and dry under Satan.
I agree that it makes more sense for the second resurrection to occur at the beginning of the Millennium for the reasons that you gave but I was just pointing out that it even if the v.5 is authentic, it wouldn't be an empty planet because it appears that no one is going to heaven (exceptions: Jesus and the 2 witnesses from Revelation) so the group in Rev. 7:9-17 would still be present on the earth during the Millennium.
By the end of the 1,000-year Judgment Day nobody on earth will be in a dying condition because of Adam’s sin. Truly, in the fullest sense everyone will have come to life. This is what the Bible refers to when it says: “The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.” (Revelation 20:5) The reference here to “the rest of the dead” does not mean that others are resurrected at the end of the 1,000-year Judgment Day. Rather, it means that all persons come to life in that they finally reach human perfection. They will be in the same perfect condition as were Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden. What will happen then
As I think I said, the second resurrection at the beginning/before the end of the millennium makes more sense plus the added question of the spurious nature of 5a gives added support to a second resurrection before the end of the 1000 years. I was simply making the point that the planet would not be empty as it appears that survivors of the great tribulation would still be present before everyone of the second resurrection was resurrected. We actually agree but I had a problem with the 'empty planet' claim.
Meaning of the "First Resurrection." What I think it is talking about.
Ephesians 2:4-6
But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved. And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus,…
Obviously, any Christian on this earth is not actually seated in the heavenly realms. Now from what I have read so far, it seems that the most likely explanation for Rev. 20:4-6 is that it is talking about the "spiritual resurrection" of believers after they accept Christ, and the "1,000 year rule" is symbolic of the church age after Jesus' death and resurrection.
Here are other verses that support that idea.
Colossians 2:12
having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.
Colossians 3:1-4
Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things. For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is your life, appears, then you also will appear with him in glory.
John 5:24-25
“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
Rev 5b; This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
If what this article is saying is so, i.e. Everyone is resurrected?
Then the 2nd death has no power over anyone who has been resurrected? That would be everyone.
This makes no sense to me.
No, the article doesn't say everyone is part of the first resurrection. Here's an excerpt:
"there are indeed two types of resurrections, but they are not set apart by thousand years. They are rather different in the sense that those of the first resurrection – the proven believers – get to sit on thrones with Christ and reign over those of the second resurrection – the rest of mankind – in order to teach them righteousness."
completely missed the mark.
This article does a wonderful job of showing that the verse should not be in the scripture.
It then goes downhill, as it still tries to make it fit a futurist mindset. Think critically people.
Futurism is bunk. in fact, its this verse that props up futurism. Removing it should point you to historcism, but bias causes some to still put a round peg in a square hole.
If you look at it from a historicist view it make perfect sense.
The first resurrection is being born again. We are ruling with Christ NOW teaching the body how to be godly.
Its not a literal 1000yrs. It is the church age. Satan was bound at the resurrection. He no longer has power over the salvation of the elect.
He is still free to cause terror, evil and chaos.
There is no gap between the 69th and 70th week of Daniel.
Futurism has hopelessly blinded so many otherwise faithful believers. Good thing its not a salvation issue.
Hope this helps. Look into the Historicist approach. When i did, my eyes were opened and scripture came even more alive.
Yeah sure, not even historcists can agree, but no other view can either, so thats not a reason to discount it.
Thats just Satan being Satan and sowing confusion.
This article was both interesting and highlarious to me (mental gymnastics) at the same time.
God Bless and I love you all!
Dude, looks like you're mixing up historicism with preterism. What you're describing is preterism.
Preterism was invented by a Catholic priest in direct opposition to futurism (invented by another Catholic priest). Both were invented to distract people from the Protestant reformation's identification of the Papacy as the prophesied Anti-Christ.
What the website is describing is actually historicism (different from both preterism and futurism). Read here for more of church history: https://christianityoriginal.com/mp/index.php/dec…
No where in the Bible does it say there is a "second resurrection", 1Cor 15 22-23a "For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23a But every man in his own order:" the word order is G5001 in Strongs Greek. Concordance from G5021; something orderly in arrangement (a troop), that is, (figuratively) a series or succession: – order.
So, Brian says the first resurrection is being born again. Jn 3:8 Jesus explains to Nicodemus, "The wind blows where it wants to and you hear it's sound, but don't know where it comes from and where it is going. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit."
Wind is invisible! Lots of false doctrine out there.
Coming Kingdom of God is not futuristic, it is Prophetic, and can be supported with scripture.